A large energy multinational in respect of potential arbitration claims, including under different bilateral and multilateral investment treaties, in connection with oil and gas assets in Central Asia.
Ukraine, Respondent in an SCC arbitration in Stockholm brought by VEB.RF, the Russian State Development Agency. The dispute relates to sanctions and other measures allegedly targeting Russian banks in Ukraine after 2014. The claims are brought under the Ukraine-Russia bilateral investment treaty.
Ukraine, Respondent in an ICSID arbitration initiated by Emergofin B.V. and Velbay Holdings Ltd. under the Netherlands-Ukraine bilateral investment treaty (ICSID Case No. ARB/16/35). The dispute relates to measures allegedly targeting an aluminum and alumina production company, including in respect of electricity pricing and Ukraine’s transition to a liberalised electricity market, and sanctions issued against the Claimants and their ultimate Russian owner.
A Turkish industrial company regarding the application to the company’s worldwide operations of EU sanctions imposed in the context of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
A Turkish construction company with respect to potential investment arbitration claims under the Turkey-Turkmenistan bilateral investment treaty, and parallel claims before the Turkmen local courts.
A large energy multinational in a complex construction dispute worth over $1 billion with a contractor in connection with a megaproject for an oil and gas facility in Central Asia. The dispute includes issues of delay and defects. English law applies.
Two Greek subsidiaries of a North American mining & metals company in seven LCIA arbitrations in London against a European trading firm. The dispute related to the performance of various contracts for the sale and purchase of metal concentrates. English law and Swiss law applied.
A Middle Eastern businessperson in an ICC arbitration in Geneva related to the dissolution of a long-standing family partnership. The law of a Gulf State and Swiss law applied. Billions of dollars were at stake.
The Republic of Lithuania, Claimant in an SCC arbitration in Stockholm against Russian State-owned Gazprom in relation to Gazprom’s contractual obligations to supply gas based on fair prices.
The Republic of Lithuania, Respondent in an UNCITRAL arbitration administered by the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague commenced by Gazprom under the Russia-Lithuania BIT, arising out of Lithuania’s implementation of the EU Third Energy Package.
The majority shareholders in the former Yukos Oil Company, in multiple jurisdictions in relation to the setting aside and recognition and enforcement of the awards against the Russian Federation in a series of three UNCITRAL arbitrations administered by the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague, and in the underlying arbitration proceedings. The claims were brought under the Energy Charter Treaty. The Russian Federation was ordered to pay over $50 billion for the expropriation of the Claimants’ investment in the company—the largest award ever rendered by an arbitral tribunal.
A French-German consortium in an ICC arbitration in Stockholm against a Finnish utility company. The dispute arose from an agreement for the construction of a nuclear power plant in Finland. Finnish law governed. Over €6.1 billion was at stake.
A European contractor, Respondent in an ICC arbitration in Paris regarding the construction of a chemical industrial facility in a Latin American country. The dispute related to claims for extensions of time and additional payment. The Respondent counterclaimed, seeking damages in respect of deficient and untimely construction works performed by the Claimant. The law of the Latin American country applied.